DoD is accelerating AI adoption, and defense programs are expanding. Learn what this means for visitor access, ITAR, CMMC evidence, sanctions screening, and audit-ready logs.
Defense programs are moving fast, and AI is getting pulled from “experiment” into “execution.” When the government accelerates capability rollout, contractors feel it first: tighter timelines, more audits, more visitors, more subs, more sensitive work, more pressure to prove controls.
The big shift is simple: the question is no longer “Do you use AI,” it’s “Can you prove control, oversight, and evidence.”
The Department of Defense has been shifting from studying generative AI to operationalizing it. DoD leadership has discussed sunsetting Task Force Lima and standing up an AI Rapid Capability Cell under the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) to drive implementation and adoption outcomes.
That matters because when DoD goes from “assess” to “deploy,” the supplier ecosystem gets dragged forward with it, including physical security, visitor screening, and audit evidence expectations.
Global military spending has been on a strong upward trend. SIPRI reported world military expenditure hit a record in 2023, increasing year over year. More funding and urgency tends to produce:
Growth is good. Chaos is expensive.
When AI adoption accelerates in defense, your compliance posture gets tested in real life, not in a policy binder. The most painful gaps usually show up at the front desk:
Visitor arrives under pressure
Host is busy
Screening returns match
Decision needed
Auditors later ask: “Show me who decided, why, and what was reviewed.”
AI assists, humans approve, every step is logged.
That human-in-the-loop structure is also the safest way to use AI in regulated workflows, because you can prove oversight and you can explain decisions clearly.
Most teams do not fail audits because they did nothing. They fail because they cannot prove what happened. If your process is scattered across emails, sticky notes, and “ask Jim,” you do not have a process, you have a hope.
Screening inputs and results saved automatically
Who approved or escalated, and exactly when
Clean, fast, consistent evidence bundles
Low friction, high accountability
Zero ambiguity, high control
This is where most generic VMS tools break. They were built for office lobbies, not export control reality.
SecurePoint USA is built specifically for regulated facilities that need sanctions screening at the moment it matters, human review and adjudication when needed, ITAR and EAR aware workflows, and immutable audit logs and exports that hold up under scrutiny.
If defense is accelerating AI and capability delivery, your facility controls cannot lag behind. Visitor flow is not a side detail, it’s one of the easiest places for compliance to fail publicly.
No. AI provides assistive signals, and humans make the final access decisions. The system logs the decision trail for audit evidence.
Because auditors want accountability. A named decision-maker, a timestamp, and documented reasoning beats “the system decided.”
Physical access controls and evidence trails matter. If you cannot produce logs showing who entered, why, and who approved exceptions, you are vulnerable during reviews.
You get more vendors, more visitors, more exceptions, and more audits. Standardization and evidence become survival tools, not “nice to have.”
Get audit-ready visitor management, sanctions screening, and compliance logs in one platform.
Get weekly insights on sanctions, export controls, and visitor compliance delivered to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Related posts
More guidance on sanctions, export controls, and visitor management for regulated facilities.
Most schools think sanctions compliance is a bank problem. OFAC disagrees. A $1.72M settlement linked to a drug cartel shows why tuition screening is now critical.
New Treasury sanctions on a Caribbean narcotics network highlight hidden risks in global logistics and visitor management. Learn how to screen for these threats.
The CEO of "Precision Aero" thought they were ready. Then the auditor asked one question. A cautionary tale about Visitor Management compliance gaps.